Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 02:56:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E57C1EA5A16D794E0E28F358BCE5D1BD031479831C809D4323C24601E4B4A2B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed CN doesn't suggest the OP is inaccurate in any way. Feel free to add your additional info about apocryphal books in the Replies. (In fact, someone has already done so.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781270452142571818
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E57C1EA5A16D794E0E28F358BCE5D1BD031479831C809D4323C24601E4B4A2B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1713581775500
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781270452142571818E57C1EA5A16D794E0E28F358BCE5D1BD031479831C809D4323C24601E4B4A2B1