Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 22:43:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 632F66DD6B6DEE27A3A0E005269DB0B11EE0BB915984EF105F9B27D4A6F88AA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed CN doesn't suggest the OP is inaccurate in any way. Feel free to add your additional info about apocryphal books in the Replies. (In fact, someone has already done so.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781270452142571818
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 632F66DD6B6DEE27A3A0E005269DB0B11EE0BB915984EF105F9B27D4A6F88AA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1713566614451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781270452142571818632F66DD6B6DEE27A3A0E005269DB0B11EE0BB915984EF105F9B27D4A6F88AA2