Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 17:38:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DED30A291ABA6D996E8D873EE864AE44770D80AA32EF6FE1715B35DFA8494F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed CN doesn't suggest the OP is inaccurate in any way. Feel free to add your additional info about apocryphal books in the Replies. (In fact, someone has already done so.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781270452142571818
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DED30A291ABA6D996E8D873EE864AE44770D80AA32EF6FE1715B35DFA8494F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1713548336948
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17812704521425718183DED30A291ABA6D996E8D873EE864AE44770D80AA32EF6FE1715B35DFA8494F7