Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 01:08:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed CN doesn't suggest the OP is inaccurate in any way. Feel free to add your additional info about apocryphal books in the Replies. (In fact, someone has already done so.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781270452142571818
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1713575287944
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781270452142571818270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA