Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 22:22:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E9A80643D678371E290DB65B7B24F364326000BF7E6E82479802166F11E79EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed CN doesn't suggest the OP is inaccurate in any way. Feel free to add your additional info about apocryphal books in the Replies. (In fact, someone has already done so.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781270452142571818
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E9A80643D678371E290DB65B7B24F364326000BF7E6E82479802166F11E79EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1713565326077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17812704521425718181E9A80643D678371E290DB65B7B24F364326000BF7E6E82479802166F11E79EE