Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 15:09:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5C818A51CD6125C92527793FCDE6EE62B5CCFDB2EB823F7B90B36A9A8FE296D
Participant Details

Original Note:

実際には客観的医療記録の発生がコロナ禍の接種者vs未接種者や接種直後vsそれ以外を調べた重篤疾患のメタ解析からは以下のmRNAワクチンの知見が報告されてます ①接種で心筋炎のリスク上昇がみられるが心筋梗塞や不整脈では検出できず https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2023.2150169 ②接種者は脳卒中リスクが低いが接種後数週間後程に数%の多重比較補正(多数検定をして偶然結果が出る事を補正)をしていないリスク上昇がみられる https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/228/10/1336/7236810?login=false ③接種者は主たる血栓症のリスクが低い(下記3.4.2 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/4/596 ④接種者はギランバレーのリスクが低い https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00415-024-12186-7 ⑤接種者は死産流産リスクが低く https://academic.oup.com/trstmh/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/trstmh/trad093/7517742?login=false ⑥他の妊娠出産関連有害事象リスクも検出できず https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655322006241

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781172040952959092
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5C818A51CD6125C92527793FCDE6EE62B5CCFDB2EB823F7B90B36A9A8FE296D
  • createdAtMillis - 1713539377463
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1781172040952959092F5C818A51CD6125C92527793FCDE6EE62B5CCFDB2EB823F7B90B36A9A8FE296D