Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-28 12:18:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0990651F9B982F53FB0DAACE29F8FF0B32BEB17EBB8F60F585E4E84478FFF25
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources mentioned belong mostly to organizations, websites and documentaries dedicated to the opposition of gender affirming care that are not backed by modern cientific research. It can also incite hate speech, which goes againt the sites rules. example 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genspect example 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Evidence-Based_Gender_Medicine#:~:text=The%20resolution%20was%20not%20passed,is%20medically%20necessary%20and%20appropriate.%22 https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781115154807099785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0990651F9B982F53FB0DAACE29F8FF0B32BEB17EBB8F60F585E4E84478FFF25
  • createdAtMillis - 1714306696791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781115154807099785E0990651F9B982F53FB0DAACE29F8FF0B32BEB17EBB8F60F585E4E84478FFF25