Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 03:40:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9CED00FF13D4E0C0F5AEE6DEB5F1F46B988C7B1B120469D4A2C9F8661B7B80F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources mentioned belong mostly to organizations, websites and documentaries dedicated to the opposition of gender affirming care that are not backed by modern cientific research. It can also incite hate speech, which goes againt the sites rules. example 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genspect example 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Evidence-Based_Gender_Medicine#:~:text=The%20resolution%20was%20not%20passed,is%20medically%20necessary%20and%20appropriate.%22 https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781115154807099785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9CED00FF13D4E0C0F5AEE6DEB5F1F46B988C7B1B120469D4A2C9F8661B7B80F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713670812398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781115154807099785C9CED00FF13D4E0C0F5AEE6DEB5F1F46B988C7B1B120469D4A2C9F8661B7B80F