Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-07 09:48:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C41644120DC530D3EF99D40D0E6A8B6C5537AAEF2BF317110886A4F9C5410264
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources mentioned belong mostly to organizations, websites and documentaries dedicated to the opposition of gender affirming care that are not backed by modern cientific research. It can also incite hate speech, which goes againt the sites rules. example 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genspect example 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Evidence-Based_Gender_Medicine#:~:text=The%20resolution%20was%20not%20passed,is%20medically%20necessary%20and%20appropriate.%22 https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781115154807099785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C41644120DC530D3EF99D40D0E6A8B6C5537AAEF2BF317110886A4F9C5410264
  • createdAtMillis - 1725702527193
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1781115154807099785C41644120DC530D3EF99D40D0E6A8B6C5537AAEF2BF317110886A4F9C5410264