Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 00:42:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources mentioned belong mostly to organizations, websites and documentaries dedicated to the opposition of gender affirming care that are not backed by modern cientific research. It can also incite hate speech, which goes againt the sites rules. example 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genspect example 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Evidence-Based_Gender_Medicine#:~:text=The%20resolution%20was%20not%20passed,is%20medically%20necessary%20and%20appropriate.%22 https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781115154807099785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713487354354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781115154807099785970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F