Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 09:24:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 812A80680CF557E263FFB70FCC749B077E14088D893F1F035958507CE52D0943
Participant Details

Original Note:

The sources mentioned belong mostly to organizations, websites and documentaries dedicated to the opposition of gender affirming care that are not backed by modern cientific research. It can also incite hate speech, which goes againt the sites rules. example 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genspect example 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Evidence-Based_Gender_Medicine#:~:text=The%20resolution%20was%20not%20passed,is%20medically%20necessary%20and%20appropriate.%22 https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781115154807099785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 812A80680CF557E263FFB70FCC749B077E14088D893F1F035958507CE52D0943
  • createdAtMillis - 1713518673873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781115154807099785812A80680CF557E263FFB70FCC749B077E14088D893F1F035958507CE52D0943