Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 01:59:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C275BCEB2B5B5A392FE30EF3C6E230A53523CA8898F898E17BCC646F13C094B
Participant Details

Original Note:

If this is satire: no note needed. If this guy is completely serious: still no note needed. The proposed note belongs in the comments. People can decide for themselves if they want to boycott without your opinion on its effectiveness, regardless of how correct you may be.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781100858693783854
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C275BCEB2B5B5A392FE30EF3C6E230A53523CA8898F898E17BCC646F13C094B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713491956301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17811008586937838544C275BCEB2B5B5A392FE30EF3C6E230A53523CA8898F898E17BCC646F13C094B