Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 11:34:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9AF2FCDDD571E5DEED5C7D7FB9F124313568CA5DE51131278A2CEEC1BEC3ADA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the independent Cass review, led by one of the UKs leading paediatricians, "threw out" over 100 studies is entirely false. The authors of this tweet have clearly not read the report or the systematic literature reviews. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306282521968679

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780978761950765364
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9AF2FCDDD571E5DEED5C7D7FB9F124313568CA5DE51131278A2CEEC1BEC3ADA
  • createdAtMillis - 1713526451744
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780978761950765364F9AF2FCDDD571E5DEED5C7D7FB9F124313568CA5DE51131278A2CEEC1BEC3ADA