Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 15:32:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C950EFA1144AF8E435B5353A9FDB116EB4D43E91DA8C0C0B2C39F6860219BD46
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the independent Cass review, led by one of the UKs leading paediatricians, "threw out" over 100 studies is entirely false. The authors of this tweet have clearly not read the report or the systematic literature reviews. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306282521968679

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780978761950765364
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C950EFA1144AF8E435B5353A9FDB116EB4D43E91DA8C0C0B2C39F6860219BD46
  • createdAtMillis - 1713627121888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1780978761950765364C950EFA1144AF8E435B5353A9FDB116EB4D43E91DA8C0C0B2C39F6860219BD46