Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 15:56:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the independent Cass review, led by one of the UKs leading paediatricians, "threw out" over 100 studies is entirely false. The authors of this tweet have clearly not read the report or the systematic literature reviews. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306282521968679

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780978761950765364
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
  • createdAtMillis - 1713455799798
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178097876195076536430B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578