Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 14:21:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DB35AE97455FC2B5E5DE1C8A6E81345BDB5907D72600C7A9101EF541B68E516
Participant Details

Original Note:

This refers to absolute zero, not net zero, which are too entirley different concepts. The graph has been cropped in such a way to exclude the net zero references. The original can be found here, which shows the report has nothing to do with net zero ambitions: https://ukfires.org/impact/publications/reports/absolute-zero/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780964113377599699
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DB35AE97455FC2B5E5DE1C8A6E81345BDB5907D72600C7A9101EF541B68E516
  • createdAtMillis - 1713450076917
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17809641133775996992DB35AE97455FC2B5E5DE1C8A6E81345BDB5907D72600C7A9101EF541B68E516