Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 21:07:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

No CN needed. The announcement by Ken Paxton is accurate based on reading the text of the Supreme Court opinion. The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners may pursue their claims under the Takings Clause, but "through the cause of action available under Texas law." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-913_3204.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780701885751808239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1713388042171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780701885751808239D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1