Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 13:54:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 860BBC05732C5F7B5941816DD5F501F8E5163A37C255ED533F91E5D618048353
Participant Details

Original Note:

No CN needed. The announcement by Ken Paxton is accurate based on reading the text of the Supreme Court opinion. The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners may pursue their claims under the Takings Clause, but "through the cause of action available under Texas law." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-913_3204.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780701885751808239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 860BBC05732C5F7B5941816DD5F501F8E5163A37C255ED533F91E5D618048353
  • createdAtMillis - 1713448451534
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780701885751808239860BBC05732C5F7B5941816DD5F501F8E5163A37C255ED533F91E5D618048353