Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 14:05:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2ABB375F4BF834AC5E5E68254228D992FDE9615A51CC4DC875F7C0BBBC66021B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No CN needed. The announcement by Ken Paxton is accurate based on reading the text of the Supreme Court opinion. The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners may pursue their claims under the Takings Clause, but "through the cause of action available under Texas law." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-913_3204.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780701885751808239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2ABB375F4BF834AC5E5E68254228D992FDE9615A51CC4DC875F7C0BBBC66021B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713449112388
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17807018857518082392ABB375F4BF834AC5E5E68254228D992FDE9615A51CC4DC875F7C0BBBC66021B