Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 00:34:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B30A61AA225D93DC936EBEE9E2D0C4E434AEA4DF5BB151A32E6F3BF3A0D607C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No CN needed. The announcement by Ken Paxton is accurate based on reading the text of the Supreme Court opinion. The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners may pursue their claims under the Takings Clause, but "through the cause of action available under Texas law." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-913_3204.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780701072413376846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B30A61AA225D93DC936EBEE9E2D0C4E434AEA4DF5BB151A32E6F3BF3A0D607C
  • createdAtMillis - 1713400450694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17807010724133768468B30A61AA225D93DC936EBEE9E2D0C4E434AEA4DF5BB151A32E6F3BF3A0D607C