Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 15:14:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19D6A641DBC2B1DDF79F78849213B8EB63398D4940B7BE4DF29DF6F5257055FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

No CN needed. The announcement by Ken Paxton is accurate based on reading the text of the Supreme Court opinion. The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners may pursue their claims under the Takings Clause, but "through the cause of action available under Texas law." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-913_3204.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780701072413376846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19D6A641DBC2B1DDF79F78849213B8EB63398D4940B7BE4DF29DF6F5257055FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1713453262270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178070107241337684619D6A641DBC2B1DDF79F78849213B8EB63398D4940B7BE4DF29DF6F5257055FC