Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 05:49:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCEE7DE0C4CF5A8F9117B74E2239E2C7E1E22F1F4F4AA1E3BEE46A7E67BFA1AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

No se sabe si la devolución corresponde a una regularización voluntaria posterior a la inspección. La fiscalía lo va a investigar: https://twitter.com/alfonsopmedina/status/1780686448024232405 Afirmar eso a estas alturas es opinión, no información. No corresponde en notas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780692535587033503
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DCEE7DE0C4CF5A8F9117B74E2239E2C7E1E22F1F4F4AA1E3BEE46A7E67BFA1AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1713419387316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780692535587033503DCEE7DE0C4CF5A8F9117B74E2239E2C7E1E22F1F4F4AA1E3BEE46A7E67BFA1AA