Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 14:59:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96CE969370F1C4ACDE2DE05D285E653630864C918140A28A7F42B696A3B1BAB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existen fuentes donde expertos sobre el tema consideren al Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon obsoleto, siendo los únicos artículos que adoptan esa postura, hechos por periodistas o políticos no especializados en el tema. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-16_Fighting_Falcon

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780602554725851401
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96CE969370F1C4ACDE2DE05D285E653630864C918140A28A7F42B696A3B1BAB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1713365940557
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178060255472585140196CE969370F1C4ACDE2DE05D285E653630864C918140A28A7F42B696A3B1BAB9