Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 14:56:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31D110E250F23D3065A58CA9019477B405E0337EF8BA7E7F54D0B94B753F73B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existen fuentes donde expertos sobre el tema consideren al Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon obsoleto, siendo los únicos artículos que adoptan esa postura, hechos por periodistas o políticos no especializados en el tema. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-16_Fighting_Falcon

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780602554725851401
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31D110E250F23D3065A58CA9019477B405E0337EF8BA7E7F54D0B94B753F73B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1713365798285
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178060255472585140131D110E250F23D3065A58CA9019477B405E0337EF8BA7E7F54D0B94B753F73B1