Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 14:53:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 204F5EF39100D9022629DE865DEB6A1DB8D9F3F106EEC0E07134C8DDE2285682
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existen fuentes donde expertos sobre el tema consideren al Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon obsoleto, siendo los únicos artículos que adoptan esa postura, hechos por periodistas o políticos no especializados en el tema. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-16_Fighting_Falcon

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780602554725851401
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 204F5EF39100D9022629DE865DEB6A1DB8D9F3F106EEC0E07134C8DDE2285682
  • createdAtMillis - 1713365583489
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1780602554725851401204F5EF39100D9022629DE865DEB6A1DB8D9F3F106EEC0E07134C8DDE2285682