Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 18:40:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3F86D211435897733EE04DFD4184388F20C3CAA634E889A5D2039B0D0843854
Participant Details

Original Note:

La empresa “EctoLife” no existe y no se está desarrollando dicha tecnología. Las imágenes publicadas fueron creadas por un cineasta. https://chequeado.com/ultimas-noticias/es-falso-que-existe-una-fabrica-de-bebes-con-30-mil-uteros-artificiales-se-trata-de-un-diseno-conceptual-futurista/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780592688070357464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3F86D211435897733EE04DFD4184388F20C3CAA634E889A5D2039B0D0843854
  • createdAtMillis - 1713379212240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780592688070357464B3F86D211435897733EE04DFD4184388F20C3CAA634E889A5D2039B0D0843854