Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 12:49:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8BAA7328A409865F0B039DEA4A66035BB2CC7B9771B93BFFC0BA095FDC1DC7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

O processo originou-se a partir de um pedido de medida protetiva e foi extinto em 01/08/2022 após o Ministério Público (MP) opinar pelo indeferimento da ação por falta de lastro probatório e por entender que não se enquadraria na Lei Maria da Penha (Art. 7º, Lei 11340/2006). https://www3.tjrj.jus.br/gedcacheweb/default.aspx?GEDID=0004D3C8D2F85CC4CDB576BCB3BBFF04CA32C5122C572431

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780569524607066448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8BAA7328A409865F0B039DEA4A66035BB2CC7B9771B93BFFC0BA095FDC1DC7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1713358197609
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780569524607066448C8BAA7328A409865F0B039DEA4A66035BB2CC7B9771B93BFFC0BA095FDC1DC7D