Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 12:17:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BB670C08AA0F1B53345CEA157583539DA57C6F7F7DFB2E693CF75CCCD25A8A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

O processo originou-se a partir de um pedido de medida protetiva e foi extinto em 01/08/2022 após o Ministério Público (MP) opinar pelo indeferimento da ação por falta de lastro probatório e por entender que não se enquadraria na Lei Maria da Penha (Art. 7º, Lei 11340/2006). https://www3.tjrj.jus.br/gedcacheweb/default.aspx?GEDID=0004D3C8D2F85CC4CDB576BCB3BBFF04CA32C5122C572431

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780569524607066448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BB670C08AA0F1B53345CEA157583539DA57C6F7F7DFB2E693CF75CCCD25A8A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1713356277774
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17805695246070664487BB670C08AA0F1B53345CEA157583539DA57C6F7F7DFB2E693CF75CCCD25A8A7