Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 18:37:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 778635E258A4AA8DD6A4D7B5F03FEDD22209530C923D4CFA138130A16F28F778
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pi ayant un nombre infini de décimal, on n'obtient pas exactement 2 dans cette soustraction. Le banter est encore rater https://www.maths-et-tiques.fr/index.php/histoire-des-maths/nombres/le-nombre-pi#:~:text=Pi%20est%20un%20nombre%20irrationnel,pour%20valeur%20approch%C3%A9e%20de%20Pi.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780569115947626827
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 778635E258A4AA8DD6A4D7B5F03FEDD22209530C923D4CFA138130A16F28F778
  • createdAtMillis - 1713379040302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780569115947626827778635E258A4AA8DD6A4D7B5F03FEDD22209530C923D4CFA138130A16F28F778