Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 14:07:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CF4697BF1DFE604D3712F0C20393C2253B519C8183AE4DD899AB8924B65494B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The only current note is highly speculative and borderline conspiracist regarding the "true" goal of the ESG rating, which is an indicator of sustainability for investment funds including but absolutely not limited to societal impact of products. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental%2C_social%2C_and_governance?wprov=sfla1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1780561353809244275
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5CF4697BF1DFE604D3712F0C20393C2253B519C8183AE4DD899AB8924B65494B
createdAtMillis - 1713362846594
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17805613538092442755CF4697BF1DFE604D3712F0C20393C2253B519C8183AE4DD899AB8924B65494B