Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 12:52:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05B71B9EB874299C09495EE1C196B8DBE09CF804F57E4821A0CE519EA040A435
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The only current note is highly speculative and borderline conspiracist regarding the "true" goal of the ESG rating, which is an indicator of sustainability for investment funds including but absolutely not limited to societal impact of products. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental%2C_social%2C_and_governance?wprov=sfla1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1780561353809244275
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 05B71B9EB874299C09495EE1C196B8DBE09CF804F57E4821A0CE519EA040A435
createdAtMillis - 1713358350835
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 178056135380924427505B71B9EB874299C09495EE1C196B8DBE09CF804F57E4821A0CE519EA040A435