Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 12:22:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C53F6F988ECE90641597FBF0940169CCD31FFE85F540F2DFA23A67212629D1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das BVG hat Julian Reichelts Post nicht erlaubt, sondern die Entscheidung des Kammergerichts, dass Reichelt die in dem Post getätigten Aussagen zu unterlassen hat, als Verletzung der Meinungsfreiheit erklärt und aufgehoben. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2024/04/rk20240411_1bvr229023.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780553089382015396
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C53F6F988ECE90641597FBF0940169CCD31FFE85F540F2DFA23A67212629D1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713356530873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17805530893820153960C53F6F988ECE90641597FBF0940169CCD31FFE85F540F2DFA23A67212629D1E