Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 14:08:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29D65DE11627CE1CFFE11D46B5F10BA6D2A5B966F1F84BB07BF5DC57F3701C43
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die automatische Spracherkennung und Google Übersetzung zeigt, dass das Ergebnis von einer Frau mit anderem Namen ist. Grosse Teile des Testberichts sind nicht zu sehen. Es ist so kein glaubwürdiger Post und es gibt Gründe es anzuzweifeln. https://twitter.com/FritzOswald/status/1780310833085469160/photo/1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1780468330261881072
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 29D65DE11627CE1CFFE11D46B5F10BA6D2A5B966F1F84BB07BF5DC57F3701C43
createdAtMillis - 1713362880266
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 178046833026188107229D65DE11627CE1CFFE11D46B5F10BA6D2A5B966F1F84BB07BF5DC57F3701C43