Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 08:30:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97DE2FE0FC009B67D395ABE55A0D6E97CD8E0D95ABBCF803769037925BEA97C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

記事タイトルに誤解を生じやすい表現があります。 検察側が児ポ法による保護対象である18歳未満の児童と立証できなかったにも関わらず、依然として「児童ポルノ所持に無罪」は誤解を助長するおそれがあることに留意してください。 https://haruta-lo.com/column/child-pornography-lawyer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780456095183667502
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97DE2FE0FC009B67D395ABE55A0D6E97CD8E0D95ABBCF803769037925BEA97C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1713342605716
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178045609518366750297DE2FE0FC009B67D395ABE55A0D6E97CD8E0D95ABBCF803769037925BEA97C4