Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 04:33:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0DC948DED93CC39A4AEA5F27CD97E03D9BC7EBCCD42F9317A672B9FBD610172
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis linked to by the CN does not support calling the OP graph “fake.” The graph appears to be based on a real mathematical analysis of real data. However, the OP’s methodology may be flawed. The OP’s model has not been shared or reproduced by the author in the link. https://t.co/4qa4VpGajJ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780451815336923429
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0DC948DED93CC39A4AEA5F27CD97E03D9BC7EBCCD42F9317A672B9FBD610172
  • createdAtMillis - 1713328416473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780451815336923429A0DC948DED93CC39A4AEA5F27CD97E03D9BC7EBCCD42F9317A672B9FBD610172