Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 06:28:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75AF0145F036994890D11BD6AFCF503C04FCF533AB6C32038DA66AF84A3EB9F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis linked to by the CN does not support calling the OP graph “fake.” The graph appears to be based on a real mathematical analysis of real data. However, the OP’s methodology may be flawed. The OP’s model has not been shared or reproduced by the author in the link. https://t.co/4qa4VpGajJ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780451815336923429
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75AF0145F036994890D11BD6AFCF503C04FCF533AB6C32038DA66AF84A3EB9F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1713335292120
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178045181533692342975AF0145F036994890D11BD6AFCF503C04FCF533AB6C32038DA66AF84A3EB9F7