Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 02:58:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion of the original poster is that this “certainty” exists – whether the assailant was charged is not up for contention in this post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780351346937348535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713322710927
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780351346937348535970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F