Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 22:54:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Lo studio citato da Burioni non ha validità scientifica, dato l'irrilevante campione statistico (40 vaccinati deceduti); inoltre gli autori sono parte in causa: il loro giudizio non è obiettivo. Dire il contrario è prova di malafede e di pregiudizio politicamente orientato. https://x.com/ChanceGardiner/status/1780226479776838051

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780338925132722402
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1713308070225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780338925132722402DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1