Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 19:12:01 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1185EA25AAF780C0041FFDA5BE585B41E3E8DDACF86802E1020994449E26D581
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous bill raised objections from womens groups on the inclusion of misogyny as they feared it would lead to the inclusion of men, who identified as women and not just the female sex and it seems they were right. https://www.holyrood.com/editors-column/view,hate-crime-these-laws-offer-no-help-to-women-while-increasing-their-alarm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1780281712418722228
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1185EA25AAF780C0041FFDA5BE585B41E3E8DDACF86802E1020994449E26D581
createdAtMillis - 1713294721149
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17802817124187222281185EA25AAF780C0041FFDA5BE585B41E3E8DDACF86802E1020994449E26D581