Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 01:49:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D264C4BE47F7D53039C49A532920F86ECBB2E8DFCBA2E92EF5E253171F1684AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the current rated helpful note is citing commentary and company newsroom articles which aren’t reliable citations that support the community note’s contention, even if the website they are on is the BMJ or The Guardian.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780257019527893080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D264C4BE47F7D53039C49A532920F86ECBB2E8DFCBA2E92EF5E253171F1684AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1713318556457
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780257019527893080D264C4BE47F7D53039C49A532920F86ECBB2E8DFCBA2E92EF5E253171F1684AC