Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 15:32:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C81D6AD275F1F5A9C11E12CF87CABE8678C76443AD4DFE207B8A632C06EC3455
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the current rated helpful note is citing commentary and company newsroom articles which aren’t reliable citations that support the community note’s contention, even if the website they are on is the BMJ or The Guardian.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780257019527893080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C81D6AD275F1F5A9C11E12CF87CABE8678C76443AD4DFE207B8A632C06EC3455
  • createdAtMillis - 1713281524503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780257019527893080C81D6AD275F1F5A9C11E12CF87CABE8678C76443AD4DFE207B8A632C06EC3455