Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 18:54:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 865A30E0DDCE2B4649CFAA20F612A758C9851B8D0F4E6C8864F4D131CD02DDD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the current rated helpful note is citing commentary and company newsroom articles which aren’t reliable citations that support the community note’s contention, even if the website they are on is the BMJ or The Guardian.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780257019527893080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 865A30E0DDCE2B4649CFAA20F612A758C9851B8D0F4E6C8864F4D131CD02DDD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1713293676536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780257019527893080865A30E0DDCE2B4649CFAA20F612A758C9851B8D0F4E6C8864F4D131CD02DDD5