Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 20:24:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DF5E62CCD36BCE3DFD12C90305B48211CCCD5F0543E28D9DA90C4789CB0474D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the current rated helpful note is citing commentary and company newsroom articles which aren’t reliable citations that support the community note’s contention, even if the website they are on is the BMJ or The Guardian.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780257019527893080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DF5E62CCD36BCE3DFD12C90305B48211CCCD5F0543E28D9DA90C4789CB0474D
  • createdAtMillis - 1713299080499
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17802570195278930807DF5E62CCD36BCE3DFD12C90305B48211CCCD5F0543E28D9DA90C4789CB0474D