Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 16:02:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61F25535840BE23318CB9A297B82071DBE71FF0B998E1F6A6549CBFD226E50A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the article states, many professionals are signing an open letter and condemning the review. The writers of the currently accepted notes only use the notes to propagate transphobia as can be seen on their history which proves it's also biased.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780237815088910512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61F25535840BE23318CB9A297B82071DBE71FF0B998E1F6A6549CBFD226E50A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1713283362623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178023781508891051261F25535840BE23318CB9A297B82071DBE71FF0B998E1F6A6549CBFD226E50A4