Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 18:02:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59003C88A29F90E2884076FCD89ED21802168D4C256691E4351A55CFE2ACE0A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the article states, many professionals are signing an open letter and condemning the review. The writers of the currently accepted notes only use the notes to propagate transphobia as can be seen on their history which proves it's also biased.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780237815088910512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59003C88A29F90E2884076FCD89ED21802168D4C256691E4351A55CFE2ACE0A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1713290569972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178023781508891051259003C88A29F90E2884076FCD89ED21802168D4C256691E4351A55CFE2ACE0A6