Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 17:25:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CB8751B9241DEE9BBA536EB6BFBCC8C460F22E9C354B0C3287D9C5250D89D3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the article states, many professionals are signing an open letter and condemning the review. The writers of the currently accepted notes only use the notes to propagate transphobia as can be seen on their history which proves it's also biased.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780237815088910512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CB8751B9241DEE9BBA536EB6BFBCC8C460F22E9C354B0C3287D9C5250D89D3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713288350361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17802378150889105124CB8751B9241DEE9BBA536EB6BFBCC8C460F22E9C354B0C3287D9C5250D89D3F