Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 01:49:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D264C4BE47F7D53039C49A532920F86ECBB2E8DFCBA2E92EF5E253171F1684AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The Cass review has not been "universally welcomed", critics from all the categories in the note are cited, rendering this a false claim. Additionally, harassing journalists you disagree with is not the purpose of community notes, and a despicable abuse of the system.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780228134090014865
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D264C4BE47F7D53039C49A532920F86ECBB2E8DFCBA2E92EF5E253171F1684AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1713318565815
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780228134090014865D264C4BE47F7D53039C49A532920F86ECBB2E8DFCBA2E92EF5E253171F1684AC