Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 13:00:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9443D4DF316398F4DA83440FD12A1C370A453C924DB3B7CE8E247FF9D8DF6ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contribution is an opinion piece, not a report. It was broadcasted together with 'pro' position as part of a larger debate. https://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/sendung/tagesthemen/video-1327610.html https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/opinion-piece

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780167835722928471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9443D4DF316398F4DA83440FD12A1C370A453C924DB3B7CE8E247FF9D8DF6ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1713272454839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1780167835722928471A9443D4DF316398F4DA83440FD12A1C370A453C924DB3B7CE8E247FF9D8DF6ED