Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 01:06:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8788D4EA6389961370D5CD019D83303836A26FB7A35F6B566C227979949A1490
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court ruled on a fairly narrow question about whether a lower court had the ability to block implementation of the Idaho law for the entire state or just the plaintiffs. The constitutionality of the law is still to be determined. https://www.npr.org/2024/04/15/1238351984/supreme-court-transgender-rights-gender-affirming-care-idaho

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780036210016092255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8788D4EA6389961370D5CD019D83303836A26FB7A35F6B566C227979949A1490
  • createdAtMillis - 1713229593844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17800362100160922558788D4EA6389961370D5CD019D83303836A26FB7A35F6B566C227979949A1490