Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 02:00:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5582B9DAC3F8CEDAEBA99827EEA9124B99441A944339609D882C9D3242185299
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report is currently being questioned on its validity, due to evidence popping up that points to the lead researcher on it having pre-existing anti-trans bias. You cannot use the report itself as evidence that the report is not biased. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780021506837270597
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5582B9DAC3F8CEDAEBA99827EEA9124B99441A944339609D882C9D3242185299
  • createdAtMillis - 1713232827704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17800215068372705975582B9DAC3F8CEDAEBA99827EEA9124B99441A944339609D882C9D3242185299